Follow Us On Follow us on Facebook
Register
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Ca or Sr

  1. #11
    di Member damo86's Avatar
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    327
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,323

    Default

    text your man aabove


  2. #12
    di Member
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    2182
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    cork city
    Posts
    342

    Default

    ca are just not that relyable realy. had a few of them. mad for bottom ends and turbos. then on the other hand if u threw a set of acl race bearings and baffled sump and a stronger turbo there a grand yoke. u would hear of lads getting big power and been reliable but then they spends 1000s getting that!
    the sr is nearly always going to start and drive without to much trouble. no timing belts to be changing, better sump set up. weld the diff and keep her full of oil and away u go lad!


  3. #13
    di Member
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    982
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    3,983

    Default

    o i woudnt go pass them great oul engine they are lad bullet proof....

    nah reli wat planet are you living on lad???????


  4. #14
    di Member Stevie e39 drift's Avatar
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    1418
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    shercock cavan
    Posts
    615

    Default

    Ok firstly i meant 1 grand was just in a hurry goin trainin an oviously id go over a grand for a good one but theres a lot of stuff goin cheap lately an was lookin for advice not a pisstake on how much i said id spend ...!



    What do you mean what planet am i on????


  5. #15
    di Member
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    2512
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    182

    Default

    very old discussion ca or sr
    ca can be good engines if you will look after them and of course they are older than sr. sr(turbo) have bigger selection of aftermarket parts. but between sr non turbo or ca i would go for ca defo


  6. #16
    Junior member
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    1468
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    62

    Default

    having experience with a ca myself, i would definitely say a ca is the way forward. plenty of poke out of them and well able to be very reliable with a few simple mods. They are a great engine and well capable of 300bhp with minor mods.


  7. #17
    di Member
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    982
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    3,983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Macca View Post
    having experience with a ca myself, i would definitely say a ca is the way forward. plenty of poke out of them and well able to be very reliable with a few simple mods. They are a great engine and well capable of 300bhp with minor mods.
    agree..

























    not


  8. #18

    Default

    SR all the way. A far far superior engine to a CA


  9. #19
    . insejn's Avatar
    Status
    Offline
    User ID
    286
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    420
    Posts
    1,249

    Default

    just a note for those who can't read the thread....

    he's comparing a N/A SR to a turbo CA

    stop fucking joking a CA is far better than a N/A SR


  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by insejn View Post
    just a note for those who can't read the thread....

    he's comparing a N/A SR to a turbo CA

    stop fucking joking a CA is far better than a N/A SR
    Every body is entitled to their opinion mate. a CA will have more power than the na sr but the sr will be rock reliable for the track. I would advise him to go for the sr.


 

 

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •